Interface load cells in use during Boeing 787 Dreamliner wing load testing
Auto Expo China 2010 | Beijing, China | September 14–16, 2010 | Booth TBD
Auto Expo Germany 2010 | Stuttgart, Germany | June 22–24, 2010 | Booth TBD
Aerospace Testing 2010 | Hamburg, Germany | May 18–20, 2010 | Booth TBD
Measurement Science Conference 2010 | Pasadena, California | March 22–26, 2010 | Booth TBD
NCSLI Workshop and Symposium 2009 | San Antonio, Texas | July 26-30, 2009 | Booth 304
Automotive Testing Expo 2009 Europe | Messe Stuttgart, Germany | June 16-18, 2009 | Booth 1932
Temperature compensation of zero balance of load cells is conventionally performed using the chord-slope method. A partial-range implementation of this method, acting on a chord between room temperature and one extreme temperature is often used. A better implementation is full-range using three test temperatures and acts on a chord between the cold and hot extremes.
The top curve on the plot represents the zero temperature characteristics of an uncompensated load cell. This curve would ideally be a straight line but often has some nonlinearity such as shown here.
The objective of the compensation process is to rotate the curve to a more level position. The middle curve represents a compensation based on room temperature (Tr) and hot temperature (Th) and is consequently labeled "r-h compensated." The process equalizes the zero balance values at Tr and Th.
The lower curve represents a compensation based on cold temperature (Tc) and hot temperature (Th) and is labeled "c-h compensated." This process equalizes the zero balance values at Tc and Th, producing a relatively full-range solution.
It is now apparent why the full range procedure (lower curve) is superior: